01
Official records
State registers, court materials, enforcement proceedings, official sanctions and other restrictive lists.
Evidence-Grade Business Intelligence
Decision Intelligence, not registry extracts
Conclusions you can verify, not merely trust.
We collect and cross-reference information on individuals and companies, establish connections, and test contradictions and alternative versions to provide a basis for a well-founded decision.
For every material finding, we assess its reliability, cite the sources and state clearly what could not be established.
01
Owners
Decision map
02
Top management
Scenarios and cost of error
03
Legal teams
Sources and evidence
Primary focus — Russia. Work in other jurisdictions is possible after the task is assessed and source availability is confirmed.
Demonstration workspace
Relationship map
Select a node to see the basis
D1 — confirmed in registryD2 — probable, supported by indicatorsD3 — concealed relationshipD4 — weak relationship
Demonstration workspace
Relationship map
Select a node to see the basis
D1 — confirmed in registryD2 — probable, supported by indicatorsD3 — concealed relationshipD4 — weak relationship
Research sources
Which sources we use
We define the set of sources after the task is set. Depending on the subject and the questions of the research, we use:
02
Professional systems
Commercial information systems and specialised databases available by subscription.
03
Archival materials
Historical versions of websites, paid archives, publications and industry sources.
04
International sources
Corporate registers and official materials from other jurisdictions.
Before starting, we agree the scope of the check and confirm which categories of sources are available for the specific task.
The analyst’s accountability
Every conclusion has an author
Our analytical work is not an anonymised data export or an automated score. The final analytical product is issued with a named author, responsible for keeping to the agreed scope of the research, verifying material statements, and the accuracy of source references.
01
Verifiable findings
02
Accurate source references
03
Judgements and facts kept separate
04
Clear about what could not be established
We are responsible for the quality and integrity of the research carried out. The decision based on the report is taken by the client, taking into account the risks and limitations set out.
Zarya founder
Pavel Novoprutskiy
Pavel Novoprutskiy founded Zarya and created its research methodology. He continues to develop it and personally approves the final conclusions on every project.
Service range
Formats of engagement
01
Key risk check
A concise review before a transaction or another significant decision.
Key risks
Evidence and inconsistencies
Questions requiring further review
Turnaround — from 2 business days
02
Extended check
We examine the subject’s history, connections, business activity and circumstances that may affect the client’s decision.
Detailed subject profile
Ownership and management history
Connections to organisations and individuals
Review of identified signals
Findings and recommendations
Scope and timing depend on the task
03
Analytical research
We address a specific question that cannot be resolved through a standard check.
01
Define the analytical question and working hypotheses
02
Collect and compare information from different source categories
03
Reconstruct connections, events and significant changes
04
Test competing explanations and information gaps
05
Form a reasoned conclusion for the client’s decision
OutcomeAnalytical material setting out the evidence supporting the conclusions and what could not be established.
The format, timelines and scope of the research depend on the task
We define the scope of the research around the subject, the task and the decision to be made.
Use cases
What matters to find out before a decision
01
What connections the subject has and where they lead
02
Whether this is the right person: identification and identity check
03
What risks and contradictions are visible before the deal
04
What is in the counterparty’s documents and terms
05
What consequences of the decision should be considered in advance
Zarya methodology
Technology built into the analytical work
We use search, connection-analysis and artificial-intelligence tools to bring disparate information together, surface contradictions and test analytical hypotheses. Before a report is issued, we re-check the key facts, the grounds for the conclusions and the limitations of the research.
The final analytical product is issued with the author’s signature.
Section 02 · Platform
The Zarya platform
From automated analyst work to a secure client portal — one pipeline.
ZARYA/Analyst cabinetDEMO CASE · ZCI-2026-014-DEMO
Analyst cabinet
Client portal
Research objects
Every person and organisation within the check’s perimeter, ranked by analyst attention priority.
| Type | Name | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | Subject under review | Active | P1 — critical |
| Legal entity | Alpha Logistics LLC | Active | P2 — high |
| Legal entity | Beta Trade LLC | Active | P2 — high |
| Legal entity | Gamma Service LLC | Active | P3 — standard |
| Offshore / trust | Cyprus Holding Ltd | Active | P2 — high |
The Zarya platform interface. Demo case — all data is fictitious.
«The report is delivered to a secure portal, not by email attachment»
Section 03 · Research sample
See what our work looks like
See how we test individual indicators, weigh competing explanations, and turn our findings into specific deal terms.
ZCI-2026-DEMO-001 · Executive ReportSample · 01 / 12
Enhanced counterparty due diligence
Subject of the check — Sever LLC. Demonstration material, all data is fictional.
Management verdict
Proceed subject to conditions: continue only after enhanced due diligence
High riskRed flags · 2 high / 1 medium
RF-1HIGH · D2
Operational continuity is not documented
The transfer of the domain, the sales phone number, product documentation and part of the customer relationships to Sever LLC is not documented.
RF-2HIGH · D3
Alexey Voronov’s role is undefined
He took part in the commercial work of both companies; his authority at Sever LLC is not established.
RF-3MED · D2
Short operating history
Sever LLC was incorporated on 2 July 2024 — an incomplete business cycle.
Risk map
P. 11Red flags
3
High
2
Medium
1
Y · Probability ↑
RF-3 · Short historyMedium
RF-2 · A. VoronovHigh
RF-1 · ContinuityHigh
X · Impact →
Key judgements
P. 4KJ-1
The body of evidence indicates a possible transfer of part of Alfa LLC operations to Sever LLC.
D2KJ-2
No direct corporate link between the companies was identified in the registry records reviewed.
D3KJ-3
Sever LLC short operating history does not allow its resilience over a full business cycle to be assessed.
D2The executive summary shows the decision in seconds. The full evidence annex preserves sources, competing versions and confidence levels.
Questions & answers
Frequently asked questions
01How much does a check cost?+
The price is determined after the task is assessed. It depends on the number of subjects, the depth of the research, the jurisdictions, source availability and the composition of the final materials. Before the work begins we fix the scope, the timeline, the deliverable and the price of the project.
02How long does the research take?+
A key risk check takes from two business days after the source data is received and the scope is agreed. The timeline for an extended check or special research is determined after the task is assessed.
03Do you use closed databases or illicit lookups?+
We use lawfully accessible state registers, professional information systems, commercial databases and archives. We do not work with leaked databases, Telegram aggregator bots, unlawful access to state systems, or any other sources whose origin cannot be confirmed.
04Can the report be used in a court dispute or in dealings with a regulator?+
Our report organises the established information and contains the sources, an assessment of the reliability of the conclusions, and the limitations of the research. It can be handed to a lawyer to prepare a position and select documents relevant to the specific matter. Whether the report itself and individual materials may be submitted must be assessed against the requirements of the specific procedure. Our report is not a forensic examination and does not replace a legal opinion.
05How is confidentiality ensured?+
The terms for handling information are set out in the contract. Where necessary, before any materials are transferred, we sign a confidentiality agreement and separately agree the method of receiving and transferring them. For an initial enquiry it is enough to describe the task without transferring sensitive documents or excessive personal data.
06Do you work with foreign companies and jurisdictions?+
Whether a check is possible depends on the country, the availability of registers and the composition of the information required. Before the work begins we will determine which part of the task we can research in good faith and set out the limitations in advance. If the available sources are not sufficient, we will say so directly.
Discuss your task
Discuss your task
Tell us about the task and the decision you need to make. We will ask clarifying questions and propose a suitable format of work.