ZARYA-PUB-2026 · Public Document · KB-001 — KB-007
ZARYA логотип
ZARYA

Corporate Evidence-Grade Intelligence

Decision Intelligence, not registry extracts

Intelligence you can verify, not just trust.

While traditional counterparty due diligence drags on for weeks, ZARYA completes the work in a matter of days.

We don't just gather documents — we uncover patterns: data collection, connection mapping, and risk flagging are automated, freeing analysts to focus on judgment rather than manual search.

ZARYA's experts analyse the evidence, test alternative hypotheses, and form conclusions — documenting the source behind every finding before the report is issued.

Our materials are used by legal teams, banks, investment committees, and boards of directors.

  • Beneficial owner tracing through nominee chains
  • Litigation risk analysis and sanctions screening
  • Analysis of public wealth indicators against declared income

ZARYA's technology platform + mandatory independent expert verification of every finding.

One screen — one decision

For owners/executives
Verdict map: PROCEED / DO NOT PROCEED / WITH CONDITIONS + risk index — 10 seconds
For lawyers
Full evidence volume — 40 pages
Click a connection to see its source
CEOD1FounderD1Beneficiary (indirect)D3Beneficiary (indirect)D4Nominee holder 70%D2Nominee holder 65%D2FounderD2100% subsidiaryD3Subjectof ReviewBeta Trade LLCLegal entityAlpha Logistics LLCLegal entityGamma Service LLCLegal entity · auto-detectedDelta Invest LLCLegal entity · auto-detectedNominee HolderIndividual / roleCyprus Holding LtdOffshoreBVI Trust LtdTrust · auto-detectedEntity typeLegal entityIndividual / roleOffshore / trustLink confidenceD1 — confirmed (in registry)D2 — probable (indicators exist)D3 — hidden linkD4 — weak linkD3–D4 — found by us, not in the registry
Preview · ZARYA
Same question — different case

Same standard of thinking, a different subject

Pegasus (NSO Group)

What was unknown: Prior to the purchase, it was impossible to independently confirm all the key properties of the closed technology and the boundaries of the customer's control.

What risk became independent: The customer acquired not only a tool, but also dependence on the supplier's assumptions, which he could not fully verify on his own.

Read in full →
Open the research library →

Section 01 · Methodology

Methodology that earns trust

01

COLLEC­TION

Algorithmic OSINT perimeter

  • Every name/entity variant is checked in parallel, not one at a time by hand.
02

GRAPH

Mapping ownership and connections

  • Nodes referring to the same person or company are merged automatically — duplicates don’t pile up.
03

CROSS-VALI­DATION

Source cross-validation, source rating

  • Every source carries its own reliability rating (KB-004) — no conclusion rests on a single piece of evidence.
04

VERIFI­CATION

D1–D5 scale, unverified-lead filter

  • Every conclusion is graded by confidence level — from "Confirmed" (D1) to "Unconfirmed" (D5).
05

QC GATE

Independent reviewer, sign-off

  • No conclusion leaves the pipeline without clearing the QC gate — every report is reviewed twice.

Section 02 · Platform

The ZARYA platform

From automated analyst work to a secure client portal — one pipeline.

A slice of the real analyst cabinet — not an illustration.

Client portal

MY CASESSecure sign-in
ZCI-2026-014-DEMOSubject under review
In progress
ZCI-2026-009-DEMOCounterparty
Completed
ZCI-2026-011-DEMODeal party
On hold

Sign in with login and password — no attachments over email.

Real-time case status

ZCI-2026-014-DEMOIn progress
COLLEC­TION
GRAPH
CROSS-VALI­DATION
VERIFI­CATION
QC GATE

Planned completion: 14.08.2026

Secure delivery

SECURE DELIVERY
ZCI-2026-014-DEMOFinal report.pdf
PDF
Access only for authorised portal users
Every download is logged

The report is delivered through the portal — never as an email attachment.

Anonymised demo case — no real client data is shown.

«The report is delivered to a secure portal, not by email attachment»

Section 03 · Sample Reports

See our work in action

Anonymised excerpts from real investigation formats. Download a full sample report.

ZES-2026-EN-001EXEC SUMMARY
SUBJECT · HIGH RISK
Smith J. · Enhanced Due Diligence
Assets ≠ income: £1.2M property vs £18K declared p.a.
Nominee chain: Cyprus → BVI (unverified UBO)
3 commercial disputes totalling £340K
PEP-adjacent connection, undisclosed (EU, D3)
ZARYA RISK INDEX
3.2 / 5.0
RATING
HIGH
SCALE
D1–D5
VERDICT: DO NOT PROCEED
Unresolved DoJ civil investigation (FCPA)
Undisclosed ICC arbitration award
Source of £4.2M capital injection unverified
ZARYA INTELLIGENCEANONYMISED

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Executive Summary

Subject, key flags, verdict — 1 page

Download: Enhanced Due DiligenceVerify this report →
RISK MATRIX · KB-006
Dots — identified risks across 4 categories.
X-axis — impact. Y-axis — probability of materialisation.
PROBABILITY ↑
Reputational
Legal
Financial
Operational
IMPACT →
RISKS FOUND
5
CRITICAL
3
INDEX
3.2/5
C — Critical
S — Significant
N — Normal

RISK MATRIX

Risk Matrix

4 categories: Financial, Reputational, Legal, Operational

Download: Corporate Investigation
RED FLAGS · KB-005HIGH PRIORITY
CAsset-income discrepancy: £1.2M property vs declared income of £18K p.a. over 3 years. D3.
CNominee ownership via 3 BVI entities. Effective control retained by UBO. D2.
CConnection to subject of DoJ civil investigation (FCPA). D3.
SCommercial litigation: 3 disputes totalling £340K. Status: active. D1.
SAffiliation with EU-sanctioned persons (indirect). D3.
NNegative media: 12 publications 2023–2024. D1.
3
Critical
2
Significant
1
Normal
ZARYA INTELLIGENCE
ZES-2026-DEMO

RED FLAGS

Red Flags

Specific findings with D1–D5 reliability rating

Download: Background Dossier

All data anonymised. Deliverables include an Executive Report (10–15 pages: verdict, key findings, ZARYA Risk Index) plus a separate evidence annex — for your legal and compliance team.

Section 04 · Clients

For tasks where mistakes are costly

01

Law Firms & M&A

Enhanced due diligence before transactions. Identifying hidden beneficiaries, nominees, and historical risks. Materials for court and subsidiary liability proceedings.

02

Compliance & Financial Monitoring

Protection before regulators. Reports formatted for compliance procedures. Verification of politically exposed persons (PEPs).

03

Business Owners & Mid-Market

Counterparty verification before equity entry, loan issuance, or major contracts.

04

International Clients

Full sanctions screening: OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated List, UN Consolidated List, HM Treasury / UK Sanctions. PEP checks across 240+ jurisdictions. Reports formatted to standards familiar to law firms in the UAE, Turkey, China, and Kazakhstan.

05

Executive & Beneficial Owner Screening

Comprehensive background review of company principals and ultimate beneficial owners: reputation, conflicts of interest, undisclosed assets.

06

Litigation & Insolvency

Locating hidden assets and affiliated structures on behalf of creditors, insolvency practitioners, and litigation counsel.

Section 05 · Application Scenarios

Application Scenarios

Illustrative examples based on typical engagement scenarios. Client names and subjects have been changed in accordance with our confidentiality policy.

Case No. 1 · Law Firm

Preventing a transaction with a toxic beneficiary

≈ $2.3M

protected / prevented

A client was preparing to acquire a logistics company. Enhanced due diligence revealed a hidden nominee chain and a link to an ongoing criminal case. The deal was halted; the client preserved approximately $2.3M and avoided potential criminal and FCPA exposure.

Client: major law firm — name withheld under NDA

Case No. 2 · Banking Compliance

Regulatory defence under AML / AMLD6 legislation

≈ $10M

protected / prevented

A bank was blocking a corporate client's transactions. ZARYA prepared an enhanced report with a risk matrix and D1–D5 reliability scale meeting FinCEN / FATF standards. The document was accepted by financial monitoring; blocks were lifted and a $10M relationship preserved.

Client: major bank, compliance department — name withheld under NDA

Case No. 3 · Business Owner

Detecting an asset-to-income discrepancy

≈ $2.5M

protected / prevented

An owner was evaluating a partner for a joint venture. ZARYA discovered real estate assets of approximately $2.5M against declared income of under $200K over 3 years. The partnership was not pursued; the client avoided significant reputational and financial risk.

Client: manufacturing business owner — name withheld under NDA

We publish new due diligence case breakdowns on our Telegram channel — every two weeks.

Read case studies on Telegram

Section 06 · Engagement Formats

Engagement formats

Three levels of verification depending on the depth of investigation

Express verification

ZARYA Screen (Basic Due Diligence)

A verdict on your counterparty before you sign

What's included+
  • Identity verification
  • Sanctions screening (OFAC, EU, UN, UK)
  • Litigation history (arbitration, criminal)
  • Corporate affiliations
  • Verdict: GO / NO-GO / CONDITIONAL

Quick counterparty check before transactions

Discuss your case

In-depth counterparty review

ZARYA Deep (Advanced Due Diligence)

The real beneficiary and the real assets

What's included+
  • Everything in Basic Due Diligence +
  • Real beneficiary tracing through nominee structures
  • Asset analysis (real estate, vehicles)
  • Lifestyle vs. declared income assessment
  • Reputational analysis (media, social, open sources)
  • Extended report with risk matrix (Probability × Impact)

M&A transactions, PEP verification, AML/CFT due diligence

Request a briefing

Full-scope review for complex transactions

ZARYA Case (Enhanced Due Diligence, EDD)

An evidence base for court and regulator

What's included+
  • Everything in Advanced Due Diligence +
  • Extended OSINT perimeter and multi-layer ownership chain analysis
  • Historical connections and business network mapping
  • Asset origin verification
  • Full report with methodology and a Protected Annex (PA) for personal data
  • Dedicated analyst & priority turnaround

Complex cross-border transactions, litigation, board-level compliance review

Speak with an analyst

Project cost is determined individually after a briefing, depending on transaction scope, jurisdictions, and the depth of review required. Turnaround is from a few days; exact timing after briefing — far faster than classic due diligence.

Section 07 · Compliance

Legal, OSINT-only intelligence

ZARYA conducts all intelligence gathering in strict compliance with the data protection laws applicable to the jurisdiction in which information is collected, relying exclusively on open-source intelligence (OSINT). We do not use closed databases, HUMINT, or unlawful data-broker lookups. Personal data is sourced only from lawful aggregators and delivered to the client in a separate Protected Annex (PA) — after an NDA and a distinct request.

Data handling practices are documented and available for review under NDA

Section 08 · Investigation Process

How we work

Three clear stages from briefing to final report.

01

Brief & Scope

You describe the task and subject. We hold a free consultation and agree on the scope of work.

02

Investigation

We run checks across registries, court databases and open sources. The analyst forms conclusions and assesses risks.

03

Results & Recommendations

You receive a report with a verdict, risk matrix and recommendations. We can support implementation if required.

ZARYA analytical activity standard

Section 09 · About

Who we are

ZARYA is an intelligence agency built like a technology company. We engineered our own platform: a data collection-and-verification pipeline, a connection graph, a client portal, and an independent quality-control loop. Our people do what machines can't — they make the judgment call and sign their name to it.

Methodology standards: 8 · Pipeline stages: 5 · Verification levels: 2 · Screening jurisdictions: 4+

More about the founder →

We Don't Sell Databases

We sell professional judgement backed by methodology.

Transparent Methodology

Every report includes the D1–D5 reliability scale and the ZARYA Risk Index.

Dual Verification

A lead analyst and an independent reviewer on every project.

Who We Work With

Russia, CIS, UAE, Turkey, China, Kazakhstan.

Section 10 · FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How much does a check cost?+

Project cost is determined individually after a briefing and depends on transaction scope, jurisdictions, and the depth of review — discussed during a free consultation before work begins.

How long does a report take to prepare?+

Depends on the format and depth of review: from a few days; exact timing after briefing — far faster than classic due diligence.

Do you use closed databases or illicit data-broker lookups?+

No. We work exclusively with open sources (OSINT) — government registries, court records, and sanctions lists. See the "Legal, OSINT-only intelligence" section for details.

Can the report be used as evidence in court or submitted to a regulator?+

Yes — the report is built to serve as an evidence base: every conclusion carries a D1–D5 reliability rating and a cited source, unlike informal lookups. Whether it is formally admitted remains at the discretion of the court or regulator.

How is my request kept confidential?+

The engagement is covered by an NDA, and personal data on the subject of the review is delivered separately — in a Protected Annex (PA), only upon a distinct request.

Do you handle checks outside Russia?+

Yes, including counterparties in the UAE, Turkey, China, and Kazakhstan — accounting for applicable jurisdictional specifics.

Why not just ask ChatGPT?+

Do. Then ask it for its sources. A generic LLM produces a confident summary of the internet — including its errors — and signs nothing. ZARYA runs algorithmic analysis inside a controlled loop: a vetted source registry, two-source cross-validation, D1–D5 grading on every finding, and a mandatory independent review. Gaps are disclosed, not papered over. A named analyst signs the verdict — and stands behind it before your board, your bank and the court.

Section 11 · Contact

Ready to discuss your project?

Free 30-minute consultation. We will discuss the task, scope and timelines.

Describe your task. We will assess the scope of investigation and propose the optimal format.

Response within 24 hours — on any business day

NDA signed before work begins — upon request

Confidentiality guaranteed — we do not disclose client identities

Strictly Confidential

All information submitted in the request is protected by confidentiality and is not disclosed to third parties.

Or describe your task in writing — we will reply within one business day.

By submitting this form, you consent to the processing of personal data for the purpose of responding to your request. Privacy Policy.